abcc.myfastforum.org Forum Index abcc.myfastforum.org
A place for members of the Association of British Cycle Coaches to chat and discuss topics of interest.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


WCPP testing protocols, the fitness index

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    abcc.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> General Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mark the spark



Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Hull

PostPosted: Thu 21 August, 2008 15:13    Post subject: WCPP testing protocols, the fitness index Reply with quote

My coaching mentor doesn't know the answer to the following question so I wonder if any other coaches here can help as I am keen to use these methods if they prove to be worthwhile.

The coaching manual specifies a Fitness Index as used by the WCPP, whereby the power to weight ratio of a rider is 'raised to the power of 0.67' in order to provide a greater indication of time trialing ability.

I understand it is supposed to represent to some degree the frontal surface area of a rider, but I don't understand what the mathematical process of 'raising to the power of' is.

If someone can enlighten me I would be hugely greatful.

Cheers.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ruth Eyles



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Location: Warwickshire

PostPosted: Mon 25 August, 2008 11:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

The mathematical operation of 'raising a number to a power' refers to mutiplying the number by itself that many times.

- So raising a number to the power of 2 is that number squared.
- A number to the power of 3 is that number cubed (eg. '3 to the power 3' is 3x3x3=27)
- A number to the power of 0.67 is........... well you'll need a calculator. Or since 0.67 is a round-up version of two-thirds (two thirds = 0.66666666) then something to the power of 0.67 is the cube root of its square......... you'll still probably want a calculator!

Ruth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mark the spark



Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Hull

PostPosted: Fri 29 August, 2008 15:04    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Ruth,
I'll get me calculator then!

 Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Smudge



Joined: 04 May 2008
Posts: 2
Location: West Nofolk

PostPosted: Sat 27 September, 2008 21:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wouldn't it be a matter of raising the wattage per Kilogram of body weight say from 5.85 w/kg to 6.52 w/kg. Which could either be acheived by raising Maximum 1 minute power or lowering body weight
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ruth Eyles



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Location: Warwickshire

PostPosted: Fri 27 March, 2009 22:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smudge wrote:
Wouldn't it be a matter of raising the wattage per Kilogram of body weight say from 5.85 w/kg to 6.52 w/kg. Which could either be acheived by raising Maximum 1 minute power or lowering body weight
I don't think so. The WCPP Fitness Index is completely separate from the more common and straightforward power/weight ratio. It is also the ratio of power and weight, but with the weight 'raised to the power of two thirds'. This tends to reduce the impact of the weight in the ratio and reduces the advantage of the lightweight riders - I'm guessing this must be based on empirical evidence that a simple power/weight ratio favours the lightweights in a way that doesn't represent performance realities......... on flat terrain? (I'm guessing again.)

Typical Fitness Indices would be in the range 15 to 20+ but unless you know what are good/bad/indifferent values for cyclists of different abilities, gender etc the calculation doesn't get you very far.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mark the spark



Joined: 24 Jul 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Hull

PostPosted: Mon 30 March, 2009 08:52    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Ruth,
without refering back to the coaching manual, the index is supposed to take into account the frontal area of a rider, calculated from manipulating the riders mass. Hence allowing the heavier more powerful riders further consideration, rather than just the lightweights as you say.


Clever these boffins with equations n' that eh.

 Very Happy


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    abcc.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> General Discussions All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum